1/19/2023 0 Comments Topaz denoise ai comparison images![]() It is easy to apply sharpening or contrast/clarity/texture and I prefer to do that myself rather than have it applied to the DNG file. I find that the DXO processing go well beyond that and applies a lot of sharpening and contrast. I find that both do an excellent job of reducing noise and retaining detail. The ARW original and the DNG files produced by DXO and Topaz were unedited except for the crop and I applied +0.5 stop of exposure correction. The DXO files were also opened using their RAW workflow, and since there are not processing settings, processed at DXO's settings. The original ARW file was opened in Topaz DeNoise using their RAW workflow, with the settings set to Auto. The image has been cropped to 2K resolution and presented here at that resolution, so what you are seeing is 1:1 pixel resolution. I processed an A1 file with DxO PureRAW and Topaz DeNoise AI for comparison. I find that the DXO processing goes well beyond that and applies a lot of sharpening and contrast. The DXO files were also opened using their RAW workflow, and since there are no processing settings, processed at DXO's settings. Regardless of the results of this little "test" at web resolutions, I do think that the critical users whose opinions I have encountered (like Fred) consider DXO's noise reduction to be superb and prefer it to the others they have tried.Įven with high ISO files? I remember trying On1 before and not being impressed. Looks to me like set 1 has more noise, which creates the impression that it is slightly sharper (while that is not necessarily the case). I find ON1 NoNoise AI 2022 on par with DxO PR, including the resulting DNG file. ![]() ![]() There is nothing that comes close to what it does in terms of noise reduction. I guess you have not used CaptureOne but that's getting a bit off-topic.ĭXO Pure Raw is definitely worth the money (even without any discount). Good UI, very good performance and features, and a good price. I went for DxO as their software has all the features I need to make my photos very presentable on the web without spending too much time on it. I'm not sure which is which, but I think set 2 looks better. 1, set 1 looks the sharpest of the four.Ĭan't tell you which is which but I think I'm more impressed with Set 1. Also, I tried this on a photo with a lens that does not yet have a DxO profile, so no "super sharpening" mode was available. My first impression (just bought Topaz the other day) is that Topaz does a better job than PhotoLab at sharpening (preserving / extracting detail), but I guess it also means it can sometimes oversharpen by default. Is that PureRaw or PhotoLab vs Topaz (the sharpening defaults are different from what I've read) ?Īnd more interestingly, how did the head part near the beak actually look, as the major color shifts significantly betwen the two imho. ![]() Lets see if you can tell which set is DXO Deep Prime and Topaz Denoise How do you all work DXO with Topaz Sharpen AI ? I use both in combination with Capture One.ĭXO Pure Raw is definitely worth the money (even without any discount). I find DXO PureRaw and ON1 NoNoise AI 2022 both give similar superb results cleaning up high ISO A1 raw files. It’s really pretty incredible and outputs a clean DNG with nearly mo settings to fiddle with. Fred Miranda posted he uses it all the time now in the summer. There’s no settings involved and the DNG output is really nice. I tried it in all kinds of high iso photos from cameras from 2005 to now. I bought DXO PureRaw for 50 percent off and it removes noise much better and easier than Topaz for me. Hello everyone I see DXO has a 50% off sale and I’m curious with Sony a1 RAW files if you see any anti noise difference between DXO and Topaz? I find DeNoise doesn’t do as good of a job with a1 files compared to my Nikon D850 files when I shot Nikon. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |